A State Awakens (1975–1989)

Education became a right. Missouri responded.

---

Federal Law Opens Doors: From Exclusion to Entitlement (1975–1989)

On November 29, 1975, President Gerald Ford signed into law the most important piece of disability rights legislation in American history: the Education for All Handicapped Children Act, Public Law 94-142. With the stroke of a pen, education for children with disabilities transformed from a privilege dependent on charity and parental effort into a federal right.

For the first time, every child in America, regardless of disability, was guaranteed access to a free, appropriate public education.

The Landscape Before 1975

Before this federal law, the educational landscape for children with disabilities was bleak:

• More than 1 million children with disabilities were excluded from public schools entirely
• Another 3.5 million received inadequate or inappropriate services
• Many states had laws explicitly allowing or even requiring schools to exclude children with certain disabilities
• Parents had few legal options when schools refused to serve their children

In Missouri, as elsewhere, access to education depended on where you lived, what resources your family had, and whether parent groups had organized locally. Despite the progress made through parent advocacy and Missouri’s Senate Bill 40, services remained inconsistent and voluntary.

But parent advocacy, combined with landmark court cases in the early 1970s, created momentum for federal action. The Education for All Handicapped Children Act changed everything.

What the Law Required

Public Law 94-142 established revolutionary requirements that schools had never faced before:

Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE)

Every child with a disability, ages 3 to 21, was entitled to education at public expense. Schools could no longer refuse to serve children or charge families for special education services.

Least Restrictive Environment (LRE)

Children with disabilities must be educated with non-disabled peers to the maximum extent appropriate. This principle challenged decades of segregation and separate “special” schools.

Individualized Education Program (IEP)

Schools must develop a written plan for each child, tailored to their unique needs, with specific goals and services. Parents became partners in this planning process.

Due Process Rights

If parents disagreed with the school’s decisions, they had the right to challenge those decisions through formal procedures, mediation, and even court hearings.

Zero Reject

Schools could not refuse to serve any child, regardless of the severity of disability. Even children with the most significant needs were entitled to education.

These were not suggestions or aspirational goals. They were federal mandates, backed by the threat of losing federal education funding. States and school districts had to comply.

Missouri Responds: Building the Infrastructure

When the law took effect in 1977, Missouri, like every state, faced the massive challenge of implementation. Schools that had excluded children now had to serve them. Districts that had minimal special education programs had to expand dramatically.

Missouri education officials worked rapidly to:

• Develop state regulations implementing federal requirements
• Train teachers and administrators on IEP development
• Create evaluation procedures to identify children needing services
• Establish due process systems for resolving disputes
• Build partnerships between school districts and community agencies

The transition was not always smooth. Many school districts resisted, claiming they lacked resources or expertise. Some parents faced hostility when they tried to enroll children who had been excluded. Lawsuits were filed to enforce the new rights.

But slowly and systemically, change occurred. By the early 1980s, Missouri schools were serving tens of thousands of children who would have been turned away just years earlier.

Organizations like United Services for Children, which had provided private therapy and early intervention, now partnered with school districts to deliver services. The grassroots programs parents had built in the 1960s became models for school-based services in the 1980s.

Early Childhood Gets Attention: The 1986 Amendment

The original 1975 law focused primarily on school-age children, ages 5 to 21. Early childhood services for children under age 5 were optional for states.

But research increasingly showed that early intervention made dramatic differences in children’s development. Services provided to infants and toddlers prevented or reduced later disabilities and helped families support their child’s growth.

Parent advocates pushed for federal action on early intervention.

In 1986, Congress passed landmark amendments to the Education for All Handicapped Children Act, adding Part H, later renamed Part C, a comprehensive early intervention program for infants and toddlers from birth to age 3.

Part H established:

• Federal funding for states to develop early intervention systems
• Services for children from birth to age 3
• A family-centered approach in natural environments
• Individualized Family Service Plans rather than IEPs
• Multidisciplinary teams working together
• Transition planning to preschool services at age 3

This was revolutionary. For the first time, federal law recognized that supporting babies, toddlers, and their families was a public responsibility.

Missouri First Steps: Building Early Intervention

Missouri embraced the 1986 amendments enthusiastically and established Missouri First Steps, a coordinated early intervention system serving children from birth to age 3 throughout the state.

Missouri First Steps brought together:

• Health departments
• Schools
• Private therapy providers
• Parent organizations
• Medical professionals
• Social service agencies

The system provided:

• Developmental screening
• Comprehensive evaluations
• Service coordination
• Therapy services
• Special instruction
• Family support

Missouri First Steps used a family-centered model, providing services in homes and community settings rather than removing children to clinics.

Organizations like United Services for Children adapted by shifting from clinic-based to home-based early intervention, focusing on supporting the entire family.

Impact: The Transformation of a Generation

By 1989, the landscape of disability services had been transformed.

In schools:

• Children with disabilities attended public schools in unprecedented numbers
• Special education became a standard function of school districts
• Parents and educators partnered through IEP meetings
• Children with significant disabilities received education for the first time

In early childhood:

• Infants and toddlers received therapy and support
• Families gained help navigating systems
• Early intervention reduced later educational challenges
• Public funding replaced reliance on charity

In communities:

• Children with disabilities became visible in schools
• Professional expertise expanded
• The belief that children with disabilities could not learn was disproven
• Public investment in disability services became normal

The Challenges That Remained

Despite enormous progress, challenges persisted:

• Many children were still educated in separate settings
• IEP quality varied widely
• Parent-school disputes sometimes became adversarial
• Funding remained inadequate
• Teacher training lagged behind legal requirements

But the fundamental shift had occurred. Education for children with disabilities was no longer a favor. It was a legal right.

Why This Era Matters

The period from 1975 to 1989 demonstrates the power of federal legislation to create systemic change. Parent advocacy built momentum. State laws created infrastructure. Federal law transformed services nationwide.

Public Law 94-142 and its amendments:

• Guaranteed enforceable rights
• Created nationwide standards
• Established accountability mechanisms
• Embedded disability services in public systems

For children born after 1975, education became an assumed right. The systems built during this era remain the foundation of disability services today.

---

Reflection Questions

Consider these questions to deepen your understanding.

---

Educator Hub

Comprehensive teaching resources and lesson plans

---

Curated Resource Links